GP Worldwide

Creative Commons

Email Print

Deep Green: The dispossessed of Diego Garcia

Deep Green - Rex Weyler

Here's the latest in the Deep Green column from Rex Weyler -author, journalist, ecologist and long-time Greenpeace trouble-maker. The opinions here are his own, and you can sign up to get the column by email every month.

The dispossessed

In 1969, Marie Aimee took her two children for medical treatment, a six-day voyage across the Indian Ocean from their home on Diego Garcia island to Port Louis, Mauritius. Her husband, Dervillie Permal, stayed behind to work at a coconut oil factory and tend the family garden and animals.

After visiting the doctor and picking up supplies in Port Louis, Marie and her children arrived at the quay for the trip home. However, a British Government agent refused to allow them onto the boat, stranding Marie and her children in Mauritius. Throughout the following weeks, other marooned islanders appeared, congregating in a local slum, living in boxes or tin shacks. Two years later, Marie's husband arrived in Port Louis with one small bag and a chilling story.

Read more »
Email Print

Lean, green killing machine

In a story not as weird as the environmentally-friendly bullets one but still somewhat unnerving, it appears the US military is gunning for an increase in the amount of energy it derives from renewable sources. Military chiefs want to see 25 per cent come from the likes of wind, wave and solar by 2025 and while it accounts for 1.5 per cent of US energy consumption, the biggest impact could be the civil application for military developments in technology and efficiency so the rest of the country could be following in its khaki-coloured wake.

Read more »
Email Print

Greenpeace barrister brands Government position a breach of Human Rights

12 Oct 1999
Atlantic Frontier: court

Atlantic Frontier: court

Greenpeace's QC today branded the Government's main legal argument a breach of the organisation's human rights and an abuse of the legal process. The Government argues that Greenpeace delayed in applying for a judicial review of its oil licensing on the Atlantic Frontier and that Greenpeace should have made its application sometime over the last five years.

If this is correct it would mean that no person or organisation (including Greenpeace) would ever be able to challenge any Government decision on offshore oil and gas exploration or any other offshore activities to which the EU Habitats Directive applies

Nigel Plemming, QC for Greenpeace, said today in the High Court:
"The Government is attempting to deny Greenpeace access to the UK courts when it has substantial evidence to demonstrate that the UK Government has failed, and continues to fail, to implement an important act of Community law for environmental protection, which establishes rights enforceable by individuals and by associations. Such a conclusion would offend articles 6 and 3 of the European Convention of Human Rights".

Plemming added that the Government's argument was effectively saying that, "the Government and oil industry could march on until the end of time."

He added that the Government was abusing the legal process by trying to challenge a decision made by Justice Laws in 1997 at a previous hearing between the Government and Greenpeace. Laws made it clear that Greenpeace was entitled to wait until it was clear what blocks of sea were being offered for oil exploration before challenging the Governments decision.

Notes to editors:
Greenpeace has launched a judicial review of the UK Government's refusal to apply the EU Habitats Directive up to 200 nautical miles from the coast despite the fact that the Government claims fisheries and mineral rights over this area. The Government has been joined by ten oil companies, including household names like Esso, Texaco and Mobil.

Further information:
Contact:
Greenpeace Press Office on 020 7865 8255